ArticleInternational wound journal2024
RETRACTED: Effects of comprehensive nursing intervention in patients with diabetic foot ulcers: A meta-analysis.
Article in International wound journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- RETRACTION: Effects of Comprehensive Nursing Intervention in Patients With Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Meta-Analysis.International wound journal · 2025Article
- RETRACTED: Effects of comprehensive nursing intervention in patients with diabetic foot ulcers: A meta-analysis.International wound journal · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Retracted
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study systematically evaluates the impact of comprehensive nursing interventions on the treatment efficacy for patients with diabetic foot ulcers. Utilizing computerized searches of databases including PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure and Wanfang databases, we identified randomized controlled trials pertaining to this topic, with the search timeframe extending to May 2023. Two independent researchers screened the literature, extracted data and conducted a quality assessment. Data analysis was performed using Stata 17.0 software. A total of 17 randomized controlled trials, encompassing 1306 patients with diabetic foot ulcers, were included in this analysis. The analysis revealed that the application of comprehensive nursing interventions significantly reduced the wound healing time in patients with diabetic foot ulcers (standard mean difference [SMD] = -2.44, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -3.05 to -1.83, P < 0.001). Additionally, there was a notable enhancement in nursing satisfaction (odds ratio [OR] = 7.54, 95% CI: 3.99-14.26, P < 0.001) and the overall treatment efficacy rate (OR = 6.97, 95% CI: 3.32-14.60, P < 0.001). This study demonstrates that comprehensive nursing interventions significantly shorten the wound healing time in patients with diabetic foot ulcers, enhance clinical nursing satisfaction and improve the overall efficacy of treatment. These findings underscore the value of such interventions for widespread clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.