ArticleInternational wound journal2024
Evaluation of diabetic foot care knowledge, determinants of self-care practices and the efficacy of health education.
Article in International wound journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Knowledge, attitudes, and practices related to diabetic foot care among individuals with diabetes in India: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC public health · 2026Pooled it
- Effect of health education on foot care knowledge and practice of patients with type 2 diabetes in rural Bangladesh.BMC primary care · 2026Article
- The relationship between digital health literacy, self-efficacy, and self-management behaviors in patients with diabetes-related foot disease: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Observational
- Community support group intervention to promote self-management of non-communicable disease in Nepal: A pilot study.PLOS global public health · 2026Article
- Modeling heterogeneity of diabetic foot self-care behaviors in Al Qassim Region in Saudi Arabia.Journal of medicine and life · 2025Article
- Evaluation of diabetic foot care knowledge, determinants of self-care practices and the efficacy of health education.International wound journal · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To evaluate the risk factors connected with diabetic foot care and investigate the impact of health education on promoting proper diabetic foot care practices. An explanatory and mixed-method study was performed. We administered a structured pretest questionnaire to patients diagnosed with Type 2 diabetes who frequented our health examination center and community health clinics. The survey encompassed patient demographics, basic knowledge concerning diabetic foot care, and self-care practices pertaining to diabetic foot care. Concurrent assessments and scoring were carried out. Following the survey, patients underwent health education sessions focusing on foot self-care behaviours. Their progress was reevaluated after 2 weeks to gauge its effectiveness. We identified educational attainment, diabetes duration, regular follow-up, and blood sugar control as critical factors influencing knowledge about foot care and self-care practices related to it. Pearson correlation analysis demonstrated a positive relationship between scores for diabetic foot care knowledge and scores for self-care behaviours (r = 0.32, p < 0.001). Health education led to a significant improvement in the self-care behaviours of diabetic patients. A variety of factors affect the occurrence of diabetic foot complications and the self-care behaviours associated with diabetic foot care. Health education proves to be an effective means of enhancing diabetic foot care behaviours.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.