ArticleInternational wound journal2024
RETRACTED: Effects of continuing nursing intervention on high-risk patients with diabetic foot ulcers: A meta-analysis.
Article in International wound journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- RETRACTION: Effects of Continuing Nursing Intervention on High-Risk Patients with Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Meta-Analysis.International wound journal · 2025Article
- RETRACTED: Effects of continuing nursing intervention on high-risk patients with diabetic foot ulcers: A meta-analysis.International wound journal · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Retracted
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A comprehensive meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the impact of continuous nursing interventions on patients with high-risk diabetic foot (DF). We systematically searched electronic databases including PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure and Wanfang for randomized controlled trials (RCTs), from database inception to October 2023, pertaining to continuous nursing interventions in high-risk DF patients. Independent literature screening, data extraction and quality assessment were performed by two researchers. Data analysis was executed using Stata 17.0 software. Overall, 18 RCTs involving 1450 high-risk DF patients were included. The analysis revealed that continuous nursing interventions significantly reduced levels of fasting blood glucose (standardized mean difference [SMD] = -1.02, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -1.29 to -0.76, p < 0.001), 2-h postprandial blood glucose (SMD = -1.76, 95%CI: -2.23 to -1.29, p < 0.001) and glycated haemoglobin levels (SMD = -1.05, 95%CI: -1.40 to -0.70, p < 0.001) in high-risk DF patients. Furthermore, there was a significant reduction in the incidence of DF (odds ratio [OR] = 0.22, 95%CI: 0.14-0.33, p < 0.001). This study demonstrates that continuous nursing interventions are effective in controlling glycaemic indices (fasting blood glucose, 2-h postprandial blood glucose and glycated haemoglobin) and reducing the incidence of DF in high-risk patients. These interventions contribute to stabilizing the patients' condition and optimizing their prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.