ReviewCaspian journal of internal medicine2026
Evaluating ejection dynamic parameters for assessing severe aortic stenosis.
Review in Caspian journal of internal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Accurate diagnosis of aortic stenosis (AS) severity is crucial for effective treatment. This study aimed to define cutoff values for aortic ejection dynamic parameters, including ejection time (ET), acceleration time (AT), and the AT/ET ratio in patients with severe AS. Methods: In both severe AS and control groups, the aortic valve area (AVA) was estimated using the continuity equation, and the trans-aortic mean pressure gradient (MPG) was measured using continuous-wave Doppler echocardiography. Blood flow time-velocity integral in the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT TVI) was measured with pulsed-wave Doppler ultrasound, placing the sample volume 1 cm below the aortic valve. Severe AS was defined as AVA ≤1 cm Results: AT with a cutoff of 73 ms demonstrated perfect accuracy in diagnosing severe AS, with both sensitivity and specificity of 100%. ET with a cutoff of 278 ms showed 90% sensitivity and 100% specificity for identifying severe AS. Additionally, the AT/ET ratio exhibited a positive relationship with MPG (r = 0.55, P = 0.001) and a negative relationship with AVA (r = -0.52, P = 0.003). The AT/ET ratio, using a cutoff value of 0.278, yielded a sensitivity of 96% and a specificity of 100% for diagnosing severe AS. Conclusion: Aortic Doppler ejection dynamic parameters can serve as complementary assessment indices, diagnosing severe AS with acceptable accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.