ArticleCaspian journal of internal medicine2026
Diagnostic performance of thrombin generation assay in patients with acute myocardial infarction.
Article in Caspian journal of internal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Thrombin generation (TG) assays have been developed to assess the overall coagulability of blood, as thrombin plays a pivotal role in hemostasis and thrombosis. Although increased TG has been associated with acute myocardial infarction (MI) in some previous reports, the results have been inconsistent. This study aimed to evaluate TG in platelet-poor plasma specimens from patients with confirmed acute MI. Methods: In this case-control study, we enrolled a total of 50 patients diagnosed with acute MI using convenience sampling, along with 50 healthy individuals. TG assays were performed in both groups, and the calculated TG indices were compared. Results: Forty-one patients with confirmed acute MI (24 males, 17 females; mean age 62.7±14.9 years) and 50 healthy controls (40 males, 10 females; mean age 57.5±12.9) were included in the analysis. TG assay indices were not significantly different in acute MI patients compared to healthy subjects (p >0.05). In terms of the diagnostic utility of TG assays, a five-variable panel yielded an AUC of 0.659 [95% CI: 0.547-0.770, P=0.010], with a sensitivity of 65.9% and specificity of 62% for identifying acute MI. Conclusion: All TG parameters taken together appear to have a predictive value in detecting acute MI. However, further studies with larger sample sizes are needed to confirm this finding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.