Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42052564›Full record

ArticleJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2026

The AI Health Arms Race: A Critical Perspective on Big Tech and the Widening Global Health Equity Gap.

Mohamed Mustaf Ahmed, Zhinya Kawa Othman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mohamed Mustaf AhmedFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, SIMAD University, Mogadishu, Somalia.ORCID 0009-0006-5991-4052
Zhinya Kawa OthmanFaculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID 0009-0008-3914-0867

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The first quarter of 2026 witnessed an unprecedented convergence, with OpenAI, Anthropic, Microsoft, Google, and Apple launching or advancing dedicated artificial intelligence health platforms. ChatGPT Health, Claude for Healthcare, Copilot Health, Med-Gemini, and Apple Health+ collectively represent a paradigm shift toward AI-mediated personal health management, integrating electronic health records, wearable device data, and conversational AI in privacy-isolated environments. However, these tools are primarily designed for high-income country markets, with limited infrastructure, insufficient multilingual support beyond dominant global languages, and minimal cultural adaptation for low- and middle-income countries. This commentary critically examines the emerging AI health chatbot landscape through the lens of global health equity, analyzing structural barriers, including data poverty, regulatory vacuums, and the risks of data colonialism, whereby large technology corporations extract health data from populations in low- and middle-income countries without proportionate benefit sharing or local capacity building. We propose policy recommendations spanning international governance, national regulatory development, mandatory multilingual content, pre-market clinical safety evaluations, and multilateral financing of digital health infrastructure. We further discuss the strategic responsibilities of both high-income country technology corporations and governments in low- and middle-income countries in bridging this divide. Without deliberate equity-centered governance, the AI health arms race risks widening, rather than narrowing, the global health divide.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencedigital healthhealth equitylarge language modelslow- and middle-income countries

Identifiers

PMID42052564
PMCPMC13111155

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.