ArticleFrontiers in sports and active living2026
"Playing on" or "calling time"? retention and motivation for sport officials.
Article in Frontiers in sports and active living, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Attrition is a key issue in sports officiating and has rightfully received extensive attention in the literature highlighting issues such as abuse and lack of perceived organizational support. However, few studies in comparison understand the reasons for officials to stay in their role (i.e., retention) and underlying motivation. Methods: Current officials were recruited ( Results: Based on the Sport Motivation II scale (SMS-II), officials report high Intrinsic and Identified modes of regulation. There were no differences between genders in any of the modes of regulation in SMS-II. Those that intend to continue reported higher levels of Intrinsic, Integrated and Identified than those that were unsure of continuing. Amotivation was significantly higher for those that were unsure of continuing and did not intend to continue, than those who did intend to continue. Results indicated professional level and soccer officials appear to exhibit higher levels of motivation. Personal Drive and Personal Challenge were the most prominent reasons to continue, whereas Money was the least selected reason. Discussion: This study provides important implications for officiating managers in the retention profiles of active officials, depending on various factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.