ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2026
Development of a process model of posttraumatic growth in psychosis: a qualitative study.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Some people with psychosis experience posttraumatic growth (PTG). PTG is defined as positive psychological changes which occurs after the experience of trauma or adversity, following an emotive struggle with the experience. There is some research into the process and domains of PTG in psychosis. However, limitations of the existing evidence base include a focus on experiences of first-episode psychosis, exclusive inclusion of participants who currently use clinical mental health services, and an emphasis on individual-level facilitators. Increasingly, psychosis is considered as a dimensional construct. The aim of this study was to address these gaps by using a dimensional understanding of psychosis to investigate the process of PTG in psychosis, and to validate the PROSPER framework. Method: Semi-structured qualitative interviews about the experience of PTG were conducted with 25 individuals with diagnosed or self-reported experiences of psychosis who self-identify with having experiences of PTG. Inductive and deductive thematic analysis was used to identify PTG processes, mechanisms and outcomes. Results: Participants described the experience of psychosis as a disruption to an individual's life course, which is moderated by personal and trauma factors. All participants could describe experiences of PTG, but some participants reported difficulty identifying current experiences of PTG, indicating that PTG is a dynamic process. The process from the experience of psychosis to PTG was influenced by two mechanisms: cognitive factors and social/societal factors. All seven domains of the PROSPER framework were validated. Conclusions: Experiencing PTG in psychosis is possible. Further research to quantify the effects of mechanisms utilising longitudinal designs would assist to strengthen the evidence base. Interventions to support PTG in psychosis are indicated, targeting both individual and population levels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.