Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42052542›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2026

Development of a process model of posttraumatic growth in psychosis: a qualitative study.

Fiona Ng, Benjamin-Rose Ingall, Susie Booth, Matt Geeleher, Julian Harrison, Mark Holden, Felix Lewandowski, Yael Mazor, David Roe, Mike Slade

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Fiona NgSchool of Health Sciences, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Benjamin-Rose IngallSchool of Health Sciences, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Susie BoothEvaluating Positive Changes in Psychosis (EPOCH) Lived Experience Advisory Panel, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Matt GeeleherEvaluating Positive Changes in Psychosis (EPOCH) Lived Experience Advisory Panel, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Julian HarrisonEvaluating Positive Changes in Psychosis (EPOCH) Lived Experience Advisory Panel, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Mark HoldenEvaluating Positive Changes in Psychosis (EPOCH) Lived Experience Advisory Panel, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Felix LewandowskiSchool of Health Sciences, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Yael MazorOno Academic College, Kiryat Ono, Israel.
David RoeDepartment of Community Mental Health, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel.
Mike SladeSchool of Health Sciences, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Some people with psychosis experience posttraumatic growth (PTG). PTG is defined as positive psychological changes which occurs after the experience of trauma or adversity, following an emotive struggle with the experience. There is some research into the process and domains of PTG in psychosis. However, limitations of the existing evidence base include a focus on experiences of first-episode psychosis, exclusive inclusion of participants who currently use clinical mental health services, and an emphasis on individual-level facilitators. Increasingly, psychosis is considered as a dimensional construct. The aim of this study was to address these gaps by using a dimensional understanding of psychosis to investigate the process of PTG in psychosis, and to validate the PROSPER framework. Method: Semi-structured qualitative interviews about the experience of PTG were conducted with 25 individuals with diagnosed or self-reported experiences of psychosis who self-identify with having experiences of PTG. Inductive and deductive thematic analysis was used to identify PTG processes, mechanisms and outcomes. Results: Participants described the experience of psychosis as a disruption to an individual's life course, which is moderated by personal and trauma factors. All participants could describe experiences of PTG, but some participants reported difficulty identifying current experiences of PTG, indicating that PTG is a dynamic process. The process from the experience of psychosis to PTG was influenced by two mechanisms: cognitive factors and social/societal factors. All seven domains of the PROSPER framework were validated. Conclusions: Experiencing PTG in psychosis is possible. Further research to quantify the effects of mechanisms utilising longitudinal designs would assist to strengthen the evidence base. Interventions to support PTG in psychosis are indicated, targeting both individual and population levels.

Indexed as

mechanismsmental healthoutcomespositive changeposttraumatic growthpsychosisqualitativerecovery

Identifiers

PMID42052542
PMCPMC13112059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.