ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2026
Patient safety incidents in mental health residential services: a multicenter, crosssectional, survey-based study.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: While patient safety in general hospitals is well-researched, residential mental health services have received less attention. Psychiatric patients and staff working in such facilities face unique and complex risks. This study aims to explore and describe the frequency and characteristics of patient safety incidents (PSIs) experienced by professionals working in a cohort of Italian mental health residential services. Methods: A multicenter, cross-sectional, questionnaire-based observational study was conducted involving workers from 68 psychiatric mental health services from seven different Italian provinces. A total of 159 respondents, including both healthcare and non-healthcare professionals, took part in the study. Participants reported incidents personally experienced (FHE) or reported by colleagues (CRE) over the previous 12 months, using a taxonomy adapted from the World Health Organization's Conceptual Framework for the International Classification for Patient Safety. Data was analyzed using descriptive statistics and zero-inflated models to identify associations between respondent characteristics and reporting behaviors. Results: A total of 4,432 FHE and 4,807 CRE were reported. The behavior-related events were the most frequently reported, followed by incidents related to organizational or infrastructure issues, and medication errors. Secondary analyses suggested that facilities with more than ten employees had significantly higher rates of both FHE and CRE. Furthermore, residential facilities showed a higher incidence rate of CRE compared to non-residential ones, and non-healthcare workers reported witnessing fewer incidents to colleagues (28%) compared to healthcare workers. Significant variability was also observed across different provinces. Conclusion: Residential mental health services experience a high incidence of PSIs, suggesting a risk profile distinct from general hospital settings. The predominance of behavior-related incidents corroborates the hypothesis that primary risks are mainly driven by relational dynamics. The findings highlight that both healthcare and non-healthcare staff are exposed to significant risks, suggesting the need of inclusive and comprehensive safety interventions. Consequently, specific training programs focused on relational risk management, de-escalation, and empathic communication are essential for all workers employed in these settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.