ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)
Causal mechanisms of individual differences in hemispheric lateralization of the face perception network: A DCM-PEB approach.
Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Functional lateralization is a fundamental organizational principle of the human brain, yet the neural mechanisms underlying inter-individual variability in hemispheric dominance remain poorly understood. In this study, we investigated the causal network dynamics contributing to hemispheric lateralization within the face perception system, focusing on the fusiform face area (FFA) and occipital face area (OFA). Using Dynamic Causal Modelling (DCM) combined with Parametric Empirical Bayes (PEB) in a large sample of 110 participants, we examined how individual differences in lateralization indices (LI) relate to effective connectivity in the bilateral core face network. Two complementary approaches were applied: a hypothesis-driven model comparison and additionally an exploratory model reduction. Both analyses consistently showed that lateralization in the FFA and OFA was explained by distinct network mechanisms. FFA lateralization was primarily driven by processes in the left hemisphere, reflected in a face-specific modulation of self-inhibition in the left OFA. Specifically, increased left-lateralization was associated with reduced self-inhibition (i.e., increased excitability) in the left OFA. In contrast, OFA lateralization depended on interhemispheric interactions involving both hemispheres, most prominently between the left and right FFAs. Notably, in both cases, lateralization arose from network-level interactions rather than changes within the regions themselves, highlighting the distributed nature of hemispheric specialization in face processing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.