SynthesisFrontiers in oncology2026
Application of PI3K inhibitors in breast cancer treatment: a clinical trial landscape analysis based on clinical trial databases and registries.
Synthesis in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To characterize the clinical trial landscape of PI3K inhibitors in breast cancer and evaluate their efficacy, safety, and publication status. Methods: We searched eight major clinical trial databases using standardized MeSH/Emtree terms up to January 1, 2026. Of 283 potentially eligible studies screened independently by two reviewers, 87 trials were included for descriptive statistical analysis using R 4.5.1 and SPSS 26.0. Inter-rater agreement was assessed using Cohen's kappa. Results: The United States led global research activity, Europe formed a collaborative network, and China and Korea emerged as important nodes in the Asia-Pacific region. Phase I trials accounted for 34.5% of included studies. PI3Kα was the predominant target (46 trials), and alpelisib was the most extensively studied agent. Marked publication bias was observed, with over 60% of trials involving key targets remaining unpublished; phase I trials had the lowest reporting rate. PI3Kα inhibitors, particularly alpelisib and inavolisib, combined with endocrine therapy improved progression-free survival in PIK3CA-mutated HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer, while alpelisib was the only agent to demonstrate an overall survival benefit. Pan-PI3K inhibitors showed more limited efficacy and greater toxicity. Hyperglycemia and diarrhea were the most commonly reported serious adverse events. Conclusion: PI3Kα inhibitors show promising efficacy in PIK3CA-mutated HR+/HER2- breast cancer, but publication bias, resistance, target-specific toxicity, and geographic disparities remain major barriers. Mandatory trial reporting, biomarker-guided treatment, and international collaboration should be prioritized.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.