ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026
The role of AI-driven decision support in immunotherapy for predicting pathological complete response in triple-negative breast cancer.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Neoadjuvant pembrolizumab combined with chemotherapy has become a standard treatment strategy for early-stage triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). However, real-world evidence regarding its effectiveness and models for predicting pathological complete response (pCR) remain limited. Methods: We retrospectively collected data from 248 patients with TNBC who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) with or without pembrolizumab followed by surgery between May 2023 and December 2025. Patients were categorized into two groups: the pembrolizumab-chemotherapy group (n = 40) and the chemotherapy-alone group (n = 208). Propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to balance baseline characteristics. Machine learning models were developed using routinely available clinical and pathological variables to predict pCR, and model interpretability was evaluated using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP). Results: Both before and after PSM, the pembrolizumab-chemotherapy group achieved a higher pCR rate than the chemotherapy-alone group (before: 50.0% vs. 30.8%, p = 0.030; after: 47.2% vs. 26.5%, p = 0.037). LASSO regression selected six variables associated with pCR, including pembrolizumab, age, sum of diameters of target lesions (SLD), Ki67, N stage, and clinical stage. In the training cohort, these six variables were used to develop eight machine learning models to predict pCR. In the validation cohort, the MLP model achieved the highest receiver operating characteristic-area under the curve (ROC-AUC) of 0.71. The calibration curve and decision curve analysis (DCA) further indicated good calibration and clinical utility of the MLP model. Conclusions: Neoadjuvant pembrolizumab combined with chemotherapy further improved pCR rates in TNBC, and the MLP-based model demonstrated good performance for predicting pCR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.