ReviewFrontiers in oncology2026
Multimodal artificial intelligence in urologic precision oncology: from algorithm to translational medicine (a systemized narrative review).
Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Article
- Article
- AI-driven precision diagnosis and treatment of prostate cancer: a narrative review.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence in the early diagnosis of prostate cancer: from multimodal imaging to liquid biopsy.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence in prostate biopsy: diagnostic applications, risk stratification, and precision oncology.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Precision oncology in urology increasingly depends on integrating heterogeneous data, including multiparametric imaging, histopathology, genomics, and clinical variables. Multimodal artificial intelligence (AI) offers a unified framework to manage this complexity, supporting refined risk stratification, personalized treatment decisions, and informed patient counseling. This narrative review examines applications of multimodal AI in prostate, bladder, and kidney cancers. Beyond listing individual tools, we emphasize how synergistic data fusion enhances the validation of diagnostic and prognostic performance. Clinical advances include more accurate tumor delineation on multiparametric MRI and predictive modeling of functional outcomes after surgery, underscoring the translational potential of these systems. However, major barriers hinder clinical adoption. Prospective validation remains scarce, data harmonization across institutions are limited, and the opaque nature of many algorithms fuels skepticism among clinicians. These factors collectively restrict the integration of multimodal AI into routine clinical practice. Closing this gap requires standardized data curation, development of interpretable and transparent models, and the design of collaborative human-AI workflows. Ultimately, successful translation will depend not only on technical progress but also on redefining trust and expertise in urologic oncology, ensuring that algorithmic insights are meaningfully aligned with bedside decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.