ArticleDose-response : a publication of International Hormesis Society
Understanding the Radiation Adaptive Response: General Methodology and Theoretical Approaches to the Study of the Radioadaptation Phenomenon.
Article in Dose-response : a publication of International Hormesis Society. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: The radiation-induced adaptive response (RAR), also referred to as radioadaptation, describes modifications of biological radiation sensitivity following prior exposure to low doses or low dose-rates of ionizing radiation. Despite extensive experimental evidence, RAR remains difficult to reproduce consistently and lacks a unified quantitative and methodological framework. The objective of this study was to develop a systematic biophysical approach enabling coherent analysis and comparison of RAR experiments performed under different irradiation protocols. Methods: We formulated a dose- and time-dependent adaptive response function characterized by transient, memory-like dynamics. On this basis, we derived analytical expressions describing RAR under multiple irradiation schemes, including priming-challenge protocols, radiation training, constant low dose-rate exposure, and variable dose-rate scenarios. A unified relative endpoint parameter was introduced to quantify the magnitude of the adaptive response across experimental designs. Results: The proposed framework yields explicit expressions for the adaptive response parameter under diverse exposure conditions and demonstrates how RAR magnitude depends on dose, dose-rate, and time interval between exposures. The methodology enables consistent normalization of experimental endpoints, facilitates parameter estimation from empirical data, and clarifies conditions under which adaptive effects are expected to emerge or vanish. Conclusion: This work provides a coherent and transferable methodological foundation for quantitative RAR research. The framework improves comparability between experimental studies and supports mechanistic interpretation of low dose adaptive effects, while remaining primarily applicable to controlled experimental systems rather than population-level radiation risk assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.