ArticleCancer management and research2026
Facilitators and Barriers to Cervical Cancer Screening Among Women in a Rural District of Northeastern Uganda, a Qualitative Study.
Article in Cancer management and research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Cervical cancer screening in Uganda has remained relatively low, with fewer than one in 10 of eligible women screened, despite the availability of cervical cancer screening services in most health facilities. The barriers and facilitators of cervical cancer screening in remote rural settings of Northeastern Uganda like Ngora are not yet well understood. This study therefore aimed to assess the barriers and facilitators to cervical cancer screening among women of reproductive age in a remote rural district Ngora, Northeastern Uganda. Methods: This study employed a qualitative approach to gather in-depth insight into the barriers and facilitators of cervical cancer screening. We conducted six focused group discussions (FGDs) (4 females and 2 males) with the community members and nine key informant interviews (KIIs) with the health workers in Ngora district. The participants for FGDs were chosen through convenient sampling while those for KIIs were chosen through purposive sampling methods. The interviews were audio-recorded and subsequently transcribed for analysis. Data was analyzed using thematic analysis techniques to identify significant patterns and themes related to cervical cancer screening behaviors, while inductive coding was conducted to identify codes and create meaning around the texts. Results: The facilitators of cervical cancer screening were active community sensitization, availability of screening services at designated facilities, supportive national policies, and integration with other health services, while the barriers included myths and misconceptions about cervical cancer screening, stock-outs of essential commodities for screening, long distances to the health facilities, limited human resources, and informal costs charged by the health facilities. Conclusion: Improving cervical cancer screening uptake requires a multi-pronged approach that strengthens health systems, addresses myths and misinformation, reduces financial and logistical burdens, and mobilizes community support.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.