ArticleDigital health
Comparative evaluation of ChatGPT-5.0, DeepSeek-R1, and Gemini-2.5 pro in real-world outpatient prescription counseling: A multidimensional analysis.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To compare the performance of ChatGPT-5.0, DeepSeek-R1, and Gemini-2.5 Pro in real-world outpatient prescription counseling and evaluate their applicability across clinical contexts. Methods: Fifty authentic prescriptions from four departments were submitted to the three models using standardized Chinese prompts. Responses were independently rated by three associate chief pharmacists across five dimensions-accuracy, relevance, clarity, practicality, and completeness-on a 5-point Likert scale. Rank-based non-parametric tests were applied for overall and subgroup analyses. Results: Significant inter-model differences were observed in most dimensions ( Conclusions: LLMs demonstrate promising yet heterogeneous performance in outpatient medication counseling. DeepSeek and ChatGPT showed superior overall quality, supporting their potential as assistive "AI pharmacists" under professional supervision. However, several limitations should be acknowledged, including a modest sample size, reliance on expert evaluation rather than patient feedback, and context-specific findings that may limit generalizability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.