ArticleFrontiers in surgery2026
A refined radiological classification of anterior clinoid process pneumatization.
Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The anterior clinoid process (ACP) is a critical anatomical landmark during skull base surgery. However, ACP pneumatization poses several risks during anterior clinoidectomy, including cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage and optic nerve injury. Existing classification systems inadequately address clinically significant variations such as those involving the optic strut or planum sphenoidale. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the prevalence and morphological patterns of ACP pneumatization in a Thai population and propose a refined radiological classification system based on the route and extent of pneumatization. Methods: A retrospective computed tomography (CT)-based study was conducted on 400 ACPs from 200 patients aged ≥10 years. Pneumatization patterns were categorized into eight subtypes based on the pneumatization route (optic strut, planum sphenoidale, or both) and the degree of ACP involvement (≤50% or >50%). ACP morphometric data and associated bone variations were also assessed. Results: ACP pneumatization was observed in 30.8% of ACPs, with bilateral involvement in 5% of cases. The most frequent subtype was isolated optic strut pneumatization (subtype 1, 16%), followed by limited ACP involvement via the optic strut (subtype 2a, 6%). Planum-based and combined subtypes (3a and 4b) were uncommon (<4%). Male patients demonstrated significantly greater ACP base width (9.09 ± 1.61 mm vs. 8.54 ± 1.39 mm; Conclusion: ACP pneumatization, particularly via the optic strut, is a common anatomical variation. The proposed eight-subtype classification provides a nuanced framework for preoperative imaging description and communication. Although prior classifications were largely discussed in the context of transcranial approaches, the observed pneumatization patterns may also be relevant to endoscopic endonasal anatomy, particularly regarding optic canal exposure and potential sinonasal communication. Prospective surgical correlation studies are warranted to determine concordance with intraoperative findings and to clarify clinical relevance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.