Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42052344›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2026

EPI-DOM framework for assessing fish welfare: external and internal indicators for tilapia.

Rosario Martínez-Yáñez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Rosario Martínez-YáñezAquaculture Laboratory, Departamento de Veterinaria y Zootecnia, División de Ciencias de la Vida, Universidad de Guanajuato, Irapuato, Guanajuato, Mexico.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The EPI-DOM framework proposes an applied epidemiological approach to evaluate and manage tilapia welfare in laboratory and production systems, integrating animal-based indicators with risk factors organized into operational domains (management, environment, and interaction). Methods: An integrative review (2000-2025) was conducted and analytically structured under the EPI-DOM framework to: (i) classify external and internal indicators and define adverse welfare events (AWE); (ii) organize risk factors within the Management domain; and (iii) link indicators to risk factors through cross-mapping to prioritize interventions. Methodological criteria were incorporated for contextual interpretation of body integrity, physiological and biochemical ranges, harmonization of units/methods (for farms and laboratories), and the design of practical sampling schemes (population-level and sentinel) for farms. Results: The final product is an operational guide that translates dispersed evidence into a replicable welfare assessment system, including domain-based risk matrices, checklists, and preventive/corrective action guidance to identify critical welfare points and support context-specific decision-making. Discussion: EPI-DOM bridges welfare science and applied epidemiology by preserving traceability (indicator-risk-management-intervention), promoting comparability across systems, and allowing operational thresholds and sampling strategies to be adapted to local conditions without compromising methodological consistency. Conclusions: This EPI-DOM-aligned guide provides a dynamic, verifiable framework to support welfare improvement in tilapia, enabling evidence-based decision-making and implementation of good practices in both laboratory and field settings.

Indexed as

animal welfareaquacultureEPI-DOMindicatorsmanagementrisk factorstilapiawelfare assessment

Identifiers

PMID42052344
PMCPMC13111080

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.