ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2026
EPI-DOM framework for assessing fish welfare: external and internal indicators for tilapia.
Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Effect of Lidocaine as an Adjuvant to Clove Essential Oil on Anaesthetic Induction and Recovery in Nile Tilapia.Journal of fish diseases · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The EPI-DOM framework proposes an applied epidemiological approach to evaluate and manage tilapia welfare in laboratory and production systems, integrating animal-based indicators with risk factors organized into operational domains (management, environment, and interaction). Methods: An integrative review (2000-2025) was conducted and analytically structured under the EPI-DOM framework to: (i) classify external and internal indicators and define adverse welfare events (AWE); (ii) organize risk factors within the Management domain; and (iii) link indicators to risk factors through cross-mapping to prioritize interventions. Methodological criteria were incorporated for contextual interpretation of body integrity, physiological and biochemical ranges, harmonization of units/methods (for farms and laboratories), and the design of practical sampling schemes (population-level and sentinel) for farms. Results: The final product is an operational guide that translates dispersed evidence into a replicable welfare assessment system, including domain-based risk matrices, checklists, and preventive/corrective action guidance to identify critical welfare points and support context-specific decision-making. Discussion: EPI-DOM bridges welfare science and applied epidemiology by preserving traceability (indicator-risk-management-intervention), promoting comparability across systems, and allowing operational thresholds and sampling strategies to be adapted to local conditions without compromising methodological consistency. Conclusions: This EPI-DOM-aligned guide provides a dynamic, verifiable framework to support welfare improvement in tilapia, enabling evidence-based decision-making and implementation of good practices in both laboratory and field settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.