Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42052330›Full record

ArticleInfection and drug resistance2026

Efficacy, Safety, and in vitro Sensitivity of Omadacycline in the Treatment of Brucellosis: A Case Series Study.

Zhu Zeng, Hongdong Tan, Beibei Wu, Qiuting Jiang, Ying Ye, Yanping Zhang, Yiyi Wu, Yunsong Yu, Hua Zhou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infection and drug resistance, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Zhu Zeng *Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Hongdong Tan *Department of Spinal Infection Surgery, Shandong Public Health Clinical Center, Jinan, People's Republic of China.
Beibei WuInstitute of Microbiology Zhejiang Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Qiuting JiangDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Ying YeDepartment of Infectious Disease, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, People's Republic of China.
Yanping ZhangDepartment of Infectious Disease, The Third People's Hospital of Changzhou, Changzhou, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0009-0005-8637-3434
Yiyi WuDepartment of Infectious Disease, The First Affiliated Hospital of Ningbo University, Ningbo, People's Republic of China.
Yunsong YuDepartment of Infectious Disease, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Hua ZhouDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0001-6397-3203

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Treatment options for brucellosis are limited. Omadacycline demonstrates strong antibacterial activity against a broad spectrum of bacteria. However, the efficacy of omadacycline against Patients and Methods: We screened brucellosis patients who received omadacycline from April to July 2023 across five hospitals in China and conducted in vitro experiments to evaluate the activity of omadacycline against different Results: A total of 13 patients were included, all of whom received omadacycline as part of a combination regimen. Within this cohort, 11 were diagnosed with Brucella spondylitis, and 8 of these underwent surgical intervention. Omadacycline was administered as second-line therapy in 10 (76.9%) patients due to uncontrolled symptoms and as empirically in the remaining 3. Following the initiation of an omadacycline-containing regimen, symptoms of fever and/or back pain improved rapidly, regardless of whether it was used as empirical or second-line therapy. The median time from omadacycline initiation to defervescence was 3 days, and to relief of back pain was 7 days. The median duration of omadacycline treatment was 32 days, and it was administered in combination with other agents, including rifampicin and cephalosporins. The regimen was well tolerated, with only one patient experiencing mild nausea. In vitro, omadacycline demonstrated consistent activity against all tested Conclusion: In this case series, omadacycline-containing regimens were well tolerated and associated with rapid symptomatic improvement. These findings support further evaluation in prospective comparative studies.

Indexed as

Brucellabrucellosiscase seriesomadacyclinesusceptibility

Identifiers

PMID42052330
PMCPMC13111158

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.