ArticleInfection and drug resistance2026
Efficacy, Safety, and in vitro Sensitivity of Omadacycline in the Treatment of Brucellosis: A Case Series Study.
Article in Infection and drug resistance, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Treatment options for brucellosis are limited. Omadacycline demonstrates strong antibacterial activity against a broad spectrum of bacteria. However, the efficacy of omadacycline against Patients and Methods: We screened brucellosis patients who received omadacycline from April to July 2023 across five hospitals in China and conducted in vitro experiments to evaluate the activity of omadacycline against different Results: A total of 13 patients were included, all of whom received omadacycline as part of a combination regimen. Within this cohort, 11 were diagnosed with Brucella spondylitis, and 8 of these underwent surgical intervention. Omadacycline was administered as second-line therapy in 10 (76.9%) patients due to uncontrolled symptoms and as empirically in the remaining 3. Following the initiation of an omadacycline-containing regimen, symptoms of fever and/or back pain improved rapidly, regardless of whether it was used as empirical or second-line therapy. The median time from omadacycline initiation to defervescence was 3 days, and to relief of back pain was 7 days. The median duration of omadacycline treatment was 32 days, and it was administered in combination with other agents, including rifampicin and cephalosporins. The regimen was well tolerated, with only one patient experiencing mild nausea. In vitro, omadacycline demonstrated consistent activity against all tested Conclusion: In this case series, omadacycline-containing regimens were well tolerated and associated with rapid symptomatic improvement. These findings support further evaluation in prospective comparative studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.