Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42052324›Full record

ArticleHealth science reports2026

Designing, Implementing, and Evaluating the Portfolio on the Performance of Internal Medicine Residents: An Educational Intervention.

Mina AkbariRad, Majid Khadem-Rezaiyan, Mohammad Taheri, AmirAli Moodi Ghalibaf, Abdollah Firoozi, Mitra Ahadi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health science reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mina AkbariRadDepartment of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Mashhad University of Medical Sciences Mashhad Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1071-7983
Majid Khadem-RezaiyanMedical Sciences Education Research Center Mashhad University of Medical Sciences Mashhad Iran.
Mohammad TaheriFaculty of Medicine, Internal Medicine Department Mashhad University of Medical Sciences Mashhad Iran.
AmirAli Moodi GhalibafStudent Research Committee Mashhad University of Medical Sciences Mashhad Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3892-5047
Abdollah FirooziMashhad University of Medical Sciences Mashhad Iran.
Mitra AhadiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Mashhad University of Medical Sciences Mashhad Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3556-2834

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background/Objective: Clinical performance evaluation is one of the critical and sensitive components of the teaching-learning process. This study evaluates the portfolio evaluation method compared to the log book for internal medicine residents of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran. Methods: The current study was conducted in 2022-2023 at Mashhad University of Medical Sciences and in Ghaem and Imam Reza hospitals on students (residents) in case of written informed consent. The study tool included ten questions to measure and compare students' satisfaction using the standard logbook and portfolio evaluation methods. In this study, 22 internal medicine residents were included in the logbook group, and 22 were in the portfolio group. Results: According to the results, the portfolio group satisfaction increased in 7 parameters, which include the fairness of the evaluation method ( Conclusion: In conclusion, using a portfolio as an evaluation method can have a better effect on residents' training than the old logbook method.

Indexed as

internal medicinemedical educationportfolioresidency education

Identifiers

PMID42052324
PMCPMC13111757

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.