ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2026
Rethinking viral vector quantification: a microfluidic approach to standardised functional titre assays.
Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The quantification of lentiviral vector (LVV) potency via titration is a critical quality control step for cell and gene therapies. However, standard functional titre assays are fundamentally limited by an inability to detect multiple integration events, procedural variations, and, most critically, a mass transport limitation created by the fluid overlay in conventional well plates. These issues, compounded by a lack of standardisation, lead to significant inter-laboratory variability and a systematic underestimation of true vector potency. In this study, we employed a microfluidic approach to create a more precisely engineered assay environment. We systematically evaluated channel depth, incubation time, vector concentration, and multiplicity of infection (MOI) for their impact on assay linearity, sensitivity, limit of detection, and reproducibility. A 0.2 mm deep channel provided linearity and reproducibility comparable to 96-well plates yet offered shorter incubation periods, and enhanced sensitivity, detecting activity down to a MOI of 0.0625 (corroborated by qPCR analysis) - a level at which conventional well plates fail. This establishes our microfluidic platform as a device-based analytical standard that transforms functional titre quantification from a variable protocol into a more reliable engineering solution for quality testing in cell therapy manufacturing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.