ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2026
Explainable neuro-symbolic artificial intelligence for automated interpretation of corneal topography and early keratoconus detection.
Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Early detection of keratoconus is essential for preventing postoperative complications in refractive surgery and preserving long-term visual function. Although artificial intelligence has demonstrated strong potential in ophthalmic image analysis, many existing models operate as black-box systems and provide limited clinical interpretability. Transparent decision support is therefore critical for safe deployment of AI in clinical practice. Methods: We propose an explainable neuro-symbolic framework for automated interpretation of corneal topography reports and refractive surgery eligibility assessment. The proposed system integrates multimodal feature extraction, a symbolic corneal knowledge graph, probabilistic reasoning, and large language model (LLM)-based report generation. Quantitative biometric parameters and corneal curvature maps extracted from IOLMaster 700 reports were processed through a hybrid convolutional neural network-Vision Transformer (CNN-ViT) module to capture spatial corneal morphology. These representations were aligned with a clinically curated knowledge graph encoding relationships between corneal parameters, disease states, and surgical decision criteria. Bayesian probabilistic inference was then applied to estimate disease likelihoods, while an ensemble LLM module generated structured bilingual clinical reports explaining the reasoning process. Results: In a prospective pilot cohort of 20 eyes, the proposed framework demonstrated strong diagnostic performance for early keratoconus detection, achieving an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of approximately 0.95. Sensitivity and specificity remained high across decision thresholds, and the system achieved a balanced F1 score for refractive surgery eligibility classification. Expert evaluation indicated high interpretability and clinical usefulness of the generated reports. The end-to-end pipeline required approximately 95 ± 12 s per case, supporting near-real-time clinical decision support. Conclusion: The proposed neuro-symbolic framework combines deep representation learning, structured medical knowledge, and explainable language-based reporting to provide transparent AI-assisted corneal diagnostics. Although the current results are based on a pilot cohort, the framework demonstrates the potential of integrating neural networks, knowledge graphs, and large language models for interpretable ophthalmic AI systems. Future studies using larger multicenter datasets are required to further validate clinical performance and generalizability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.