ArticleEvolutionary applications2026
A Flexible Method for Genomics-Based Quantitative Genetics in Wild Study Systems-A Case Study on a House Sparrow Meta-Population.
Article in Evolutionary applications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As larger genomic data sets become available for wild study populations, the need for flexible and efficient methods to estimate and predict quantitative genetic parameters, such as the adaptive potential and measures for genetic change, increases. Even though animal and plant breeders, as well as the field of human genomics, have produced a wealth of methods, wild study systems often face challenges due to larger effective population sizes, environmental heterogeneity and higher spatio-temporal variation. Existing approaches either rely on two-step procedures, where residuals from a pre-fitted model are used as the response in a second analysis, or can become computationally inefficient as model complexity and data size increase. We therefore adapt methods from animal breeding to account for the complexity typically present in wild animal populations. The core idea is to approximate breeding values as a linear combination of principal components (PCs), where the PC effects are shrunk with Bayesian ridge regression. The result is a computationally efficient and scalable approach, denoted Bayesian principal component ridge regression (BPCRR). A case-study for a Norwegian house sparrow meta-population, as well as simulations, illustrate that the method efficiently estimates the additive genetic variance and accurately predicts breeding values. In order to assess whether BPCRR predicts informative breeding values, we also apply BPCRR to track micro-evolutionary change across time and space in the house sparrow system. To make the method accessible, we provide coded examples and data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.