ArticleJournal of family violence2026
Trying to find Safety, to make it Speakable, and to Mourn the Losses - Children's Recovery from Domestic Abuse.
Article in Journal of family violence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Supporting children's voice and agency in research.European journal of psychotraumatology · 2026Article
- Identifying and selecting outcome measures for the children and families domestic abuse core outcome set.Frontiers in sociology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This article addresses a gap in our understanding of children's 'recovery' from domestic abuse. Whilst the impacts of domestic abuse on children have been well-documented and researched, their recovery from it has been under-theorized. By analyzing qualitative accounts on children's participation in recovery programmes, the article uses Judith Herman's trauma recovery model, to make the Methods: Conducted in Scotland, the research involved individual qualitative interviews with 14 children (aged 7-15 years) and their 14 mothers, who had completed Cedar, a 12-week therapeutic and peer support group programme. A co-produced approach to initial data analysis foregrounded children and mothers' own priorities for children's recovery and afforded findings greater rigor. These priorities were then further analyzed using Herman's trauma recovery framework. Findings: Findings offer insight on the ways in which structures, resources, and values designed into the recovery programmes can mobilize children's experiences of domestic abuse to help them find safety; make domestic abuse 'speakable'; as well as provide space for children to mourn the losses resulting from domestic abuse. Findings further indicate the power of group-based interventions and the ways in which they can promote recovery through ideas of nurture and care. Conclusions: By using Herman's theoretical lens for recovery, the article makes a new contribution to understandings of children's recovery from domestic abuse. It identifies key factors that contribute to children's ability to recover including: their sense of safety, the role of the mother-child relationship and significance of the child-father relationship.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.