ArticleEvolutionary human sciences2026
Brokering peace in the ape (culture) wars.
Article in Evolutionary human sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mid-last century, controversy existed around the question whether non-human great apes have culture. To a large degree, this is no longer controversial - apes have their own cultures. However, there remains controversy around how to best study ape culture, given the varying and often dichotomised contributions from captive and field-ape research. Here, we present a historical summary of the ape culture wars since their inception and how this has evolved over time. We then focus on debates surrounding wild versus captive-ape research with an emphasis on culture, detailing major arguments arising from both research domains. Throughout, we critically deconstruct these arguments, illustrating the nuance behind these critiques, while highlighting their assumptions, overgeneralising statements and potential constraints. We further provide potential solutions to help alleviate the issues we describe, when possible. We also offer a metacritique of ape culture research for its scientific and political impact, irrespective of one's expertise. In closing, we summarise concrete recommendations for a richer and more holistic understanding of ape, and human, culture.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.