ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Clinical efficacy of five-element music therapy in alleviating psychological distress among patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis: a multicenter, non-inferiority, randomized controlled trial.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Psychological distress is common in patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) and may compromise quality of life and treatment adherence. Music-based interventions have shown potential benefits for emotional symptoms; however, evidence on Five-Element Music Therapy (FEMT), a Traditional Chinese Medicine-based intervention, remains limited in the MHD population. To our knowledge, no randomized controlled trial (RCT) has directly compared FEMT with relaxation training (RT) in these patients. This study therefore aimed to evaluate the efficacy of FEMT in alleviating psychological distress in patients undergoing MHD and to determine its non-inferiority to RT. Methods: A parallel-group randomized controlled trial was conducted in 140 patients MHD who met the predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria at hemodialysis centers of three tertiary hospitals in Yibin, China. Participants with psychological distress were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either the RT group or the FEMT group. Assessments were performed at baseline, posttreatment (week 4), and 1-month follow-up using the validated Distress Thermometer (vDT), Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS), Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS), Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), and the Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36). The primary outcome was psychological distress measured by the vDT; secondary outcomes included anxiety, depression, sleep quality, and health-related quality of life. Non-inferiority was evaluated on the basis of vDT scores, with a prespecified non-inferiority margin of 1 point. Results: The trial included 140 participants, including 54 women (38.6%) and 86 men (61.4%), with a mean age of 56.33 ± 12.16 years; 70 participants were assigned to each group. Both groups showed significant reductions in psychological distress over time. The estimated between-group mean difference in vDT score was 0.35 points (90% Conclusion: Both FEMT and RT were associated with improvements in psychological distress among patients undergoing MHD. FEMT met the prespecified non-inferiority criterion and was statistically compatible with superiority over RT at posttreatment and at the 1-month follow-up. These findings support the short-term clinical value of FEMT as a culturally adapted intervention for psychological distress in patients undergoing MHD. Trial registration: itmctr.ccebtcm.org.cn, Identifier: ITMCTR2026000143.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.