ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Chain mediation of rumination and negative coping styles in the relationship between fertility stress and psychological distress among Chinese infertile women: a cross-sectional study.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Infertility affects approximately 48.5 million couples worldwide, with infertile women experiencing significantly higher rates of psychological distress (27-40%) compared to the general population. While fertility stress has been identified as a primary contributor to psychological distress, the underlying mechanisms remain poorly understood. Objective: This cross-sectional study examined the mediating roles of rumination and negative coping styles in the relationship between fertility stress and psychological distress among Chinese infertile women. We hypothesized that fertility stress would influence psychological distress through three indirect pathways: (1) rumination alone, (2) negative coping styles alone, and (3) a sequential chain from rumination to negative coping styles. Methods: A total of 608 infertile women (mean age 33.5 ± 4.8 years) were recruited from three tertiary hospitals in Heilongjiang Province, China. Participants completed standardized measures including the Fertility Problem Inventory (FPI), Event-Related Rumination Inventory (ERRI), Trait Coping Style Questionnaire (TCSQ), and the Chinese version of the Infertility Distress Scale (IDS). Chain mediation analysis was conducted using the PROCESS macro (Model 6) with 5,000 bootstrap samples. Results: Psychological distress demonstrated strong positive correlations with fertility stress ( Conclusion: Fertility stress influences psychological distress in infertile women through direct and indirect pathways. A theoretically-derived sequential chain model suggests a potential vulnerability mechanism, though the cross-sectional design does not permit verification of causal temporal ordering. Longitudinal research is needed to confirm the hypothesized sequence. These findings suggest rumination may represent a key intervention target. However, given the cross-sectional design, further longitudinal and intervention research is needed to establish whether rumination-focused approaches effectively reduce psychological distress. Potential clinical implications should be considered preliminary and warrant testing through randomized controlled trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.