Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42052074›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

Predictive model of psychological factors influencing university students' intentions and behavior regarding physical exercise-based on machine learning algorithms.

Lihong Zhu, Fanjing Kong, Tianzhuo Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lihong ZhuSchool of Physical Education, Northeast Normal University, Changchun, China.
Fanjing KongNortheast Normal University Library, Changchun, China.
Tianzhuo LiuShenyang Normal University, College of Sports Science, Shenyang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Insufficient physical exercise poses a substantial threat to the physical and psychological wellbeing of university students. However, participation in physical activity is shaped by a complex interplay of psychological and physiological factors. This study employed machine learning techniques to predict levels of physical exercise participation and to identify key influencing factors among university students. Questionnaire data were collected from students across multiple provinces in China. Five classification models-Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Random Forest, Gradient Boosting Decision Tree (GBDT), and Decision Tree-were constructed and evaluated using standard classification metrics on an independent test set. Among the five models, the GBDT exhibited the highest predictive accuracy. Feature importance analysis indicated that body weight and anxiety were the most influential predictors of physical exercise participation. Partial dependence plots revealed non-linear relationships between key psychological variables and exercise behavior, particularly in differentiating higher levels of physical activity. In addition, the decision tree model identified resistance to temptation as the primary decision node, followed by healthy habits and impulse control. By integrating the Multi-Process Action Control (M-PAC) framework with stress process theory, this study elucidates how psychological stress, self-regulatory capacity, and behavioral habits jointly influence physical exercise participation. The findings provide practical implications for the development of targeted interventions aimed at promoting sustained physical activity among university students.

Indexed as

influencing factorsmachine learningphysical activitypredictive modelsuniversity students

Identifiers

PMID42052074
PMCPMC13111236

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.