Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42052070›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

Women's and men's perceptions of (not) wearing a bra in public.

Pavol Prokop, Ivana Tomanová Čergeťová, Jozef Balcerčík

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Pavol ProkopDepartment of Environmental Ecology and Landscape Management, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Comenius University, Bratislava, Slovakia.
Ivana Tomanová ČergeťováMMT Consulting, s.r.o., Bratislava, Slovakia.
Jozef BalcerčíkDepartment of Environmental Ecology and Landscape Management, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Comenius University, Bratislava, Slovakia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Human females often use clothing as a strategy for self-promotion to enhance their physical attractiveness to potential mates. The conscious concealment or revelation of intimate body parts can be used to solicit attention; however, little empirical research exists on this topic. Methods: We investigated the factors influencing the decision to wear a bra using self-reports from Slovak women ( Results: We found that being braless was significantly less frequent in public than in private settings. The decision was negatively associated with the fear of sexual harassment and positively associated with smaller, firmer breasts, but not with unrestricted sociosexuality. The braless state was consistently perceived by both men and women as more attractive, yet also as less faithful. Males with a stronger preference for large breasts found the braless state more attractive than those with a lower preference. Finally, male intentions to sexually harass females, as well as an unrestricted sociosexuality in male raters, were positively correlated with the perception of the braless state as a cue of infidelity. Discussion: Our results suggest that bra-wearing represents a strategic trade-off in self-promotion: while it may dampen sexual attractiveness, it simultaneously protects the wearer from being perceived as infidel.

Indexed as

breast attractivenessfemale infidelityfemale self-promotionmate choicesexual harassment

Identifiers

PMID42052070
PMCPMC13111392

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.