Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42052066›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

Development and initial validation of a hierarchically structured multidimensional scale of quality of working life.

Cristina Jenaro, Noelia Flores Robaina, Daniel Clavero, José Manuel Rodríguez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Cristina JenaroINICO (Instituto Universitario de Integración en la Comunidad), Facultad de Psicología, Universidad de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.
Noelia Flores RobainaINICO (Instituto Universitario de Integración en la Comunidad), Facultad de Psicología, Universidad de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.
Daniel ClaveroFundación Personas, Valladolid, Spain.
José Manuel RodríguezFundación Personas, Valladolid, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Quality of working life (QWL) is widely recognized as a central domain of adult quality of life; however, conceptual fragmentation and reliance on satisfaction-based proxies have limited theoretical integration and robust measurement. This study formalizes QWL as a hierarchically structured, multidimensional construct and develops a stakeholder-grounded instrument to support comprehensive psychological assessment. Methods: Item development followed a bottom-up construct-elicitation approach using focus groups and Delphi procedures, yielding 48 items. The scale was administered to 407 employees from a large non-profit social services organization. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were conducted using polychoric correlations and WLSMV estimation. Internal consistency, measurement invariance across sex, job tenure, and professional group, and convergent and discriminant validity were examined. Results: Analyses supported a six-factor structure organized under a higher-order QWL factor. The hierarchical model demonstrated acceptable fit, substantial standardized loadings, and high internal consistency. Configural and metric invariance were supported across groups, with generally acceptable scalar invariance. Correlation patterns provided evidence of convergent validity with engagement, job satisfaction, organizational support, and wellbeing, while supporting discriminant validity from personality traits and stress-related constructs. Conclusion: Findings provide initial evidence for a theoretically integrated and psychometrically robust QWL instrument, advancing conceptual clarity and offering a structured framework for research and applied organizational assessment.

Indexed as

hierarchical modelingmeasurement invarianceoccupational wellbeingorganizational psychologyquality of working lifescale development

Identifiers

PMID42052066
PMCPMC13111121

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.