Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42052042›Full record

ReviewComputational and structural biotechnology journal2026

AI-Driven De Novo Binder Design: From Structure Prediction to Closed-Loop Optimization.

Xinhao Li, Zeyu Fan, Jiaping Yang, Ruoyu Jiang, Fangyu Cao, Jinqian Li, Dan Xie, Xuanlin Meng, Mingjuan Sun, Lianghua Wang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Xinhao LiDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, College of Basic Medical Sciences, Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-5471-8370
Zeyu FanDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, College of Basic Medical Sciences, Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-2249-9989
Jiaping YangDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, College of Basic Medical Sciences, Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China.
Ruoyu JiangDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, College of Basic Medical Sciences, Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China.
Fangyu CaoDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, College of Basic Medical Sciences, Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China.
Jinqian LiDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, College of Basic Medical Sciences, Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China.
Dan XieDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, College of Basic Medical Sciences, Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China.
Xuanlin MengDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, College of Basic Medical Sciences, Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China.
Mingjuan SunDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, College of Basic Medical Sciences, Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China.
Lianghua WangDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, College of Basic Medical Sciences, Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein binders, including antibodies and diverse nonantibody scaffolds such as monobodies and designed ankyrin repeat proteins, have become central to targeted therapy, molecular diagnostics, biosensing, and synthetic biology. However, conventional binder discovery remains largely dominated by screening-based paradigms (immunization or in vitro display followed by iterative optimization), which are constrained by library size, experimental cost, and multiobjective developability requirements. Recent advances in structure prediction, protein language models, and diffusion-based generative modeling have established a standardized technology stack for artificial intelligence-driven de novo binder design. This review summarizes this stack through a practical workflow. First, we outline essential data resources and the role of complex structure prediction. Next, we detail generative backbone design and structure-conditioned sequence optimization. We then evaluate computational metrics and uncertainty management. Finally, we discuss integrating high-throughput experimental feedback into closed-loop optimization. We conclude by discussing key challenges, including induced fit, negative design, and dataset bias, as well as future directions toward end-to-end complex generation.

Identifiers

PMID42052042
PMCPMC13113996

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.