ArticleComputational and structural biotechnology journal2026
intDesc-AbMut: A Tool for Describing and Understanding How Antibody Mutations Impact Their Environmental Interactions.
Article in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Structure-based antibody engineering requires systematic and reproducible characterization of residue-level interactions within antigen-antibody complexes. In our previous double-point mutation strategy, mutant selection was guided by preservation or enhancement of favorable local interactions; however, identifying and comparing these interactions depended on labor-intensive manual structural inspection. Here, we present intDesc-AbMut, a residue-centric computational tool that automates the extraction, classification, visualization, and descriptor generation of interactions involving designated residues in antigen-antibody complexes. The software explicitly defines 36 interaction types, encompassing conventional hydrogen bonds and van der Waals contacts as well as weak hydrogen bonds (e.g., CH···O and CH···π), sulfur-related contacts, bond dipole interactions, and orthogonal multipolar interactions. This fine-grained interaction taxonomy enables quantitative representation of local packing, weak hydrogen bonding, and directional electrostatic features surrounding mutated residues. As a proof of concept, we incorporate these interaction descriptors into a machine learning framework to evaluate whether they encode structural characteristics consistent with experimentally observed side-chain conformations. The results demonstrate that the descriptors capture meaningful structural signals underlying crystal-structure-like conformations. This analysis assesses descriptor informativeness rather than predicting binding affinity. In summary, intDesc-AbMut provides a systematic and extendable framework for mutation-focused interaction analysis in antibody structural studies and related protein design applications.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.