ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Machine learning-based prediction of treatment response in comorbid hepatitis C patients receiving DAA therapy: a real-world study from Pakistan.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection remains highly prevalent in Pakistan, particularly among patients with multiple comorbid conditions. Despite the widespread availability of direct-acting antivirals (DAAs), practical machine learning approaches to predict sustained virological response (SVR) are still lacking in resource-limited settings. Methods: This retrospective cohort study analyzed 221 comorbid HCV patients treated with Sofosbuvir + Daclatasvir ± Ribavirin combination therapy. Baseline demographic and laboratory parameters were preprocessed using standard scaling methods. The dataset was split into 70% training and 30% testing subsets, and class imbalance in the training set was addressed using SMOTE. Five machine learning models, logistic regression, decision tree, random forest, XGBoost, and SVM, were tuned using stratified five-fold cross-validation. Evaluation metrics, including accuracy, precision, recall, specificity, F1-score, and ROC-AUC, were used to assess test-set performance, and SHAP analysis was conducted for the top-performing model. Results: Among the 221 patients, 162 (73%) achieved SVR. Random Forest and SVM demonstrated the best discriminatory performance, with Random Forest achieving the highest accuracy (0.73), precision (0.84), and F1-score (0.81), while SVM produced the highest recall (0.82) and ROC-AUC (0.76). ALT and AST consistently emerged as the strongest predictors associated with treatment failure. Conclusion: These findings support the potential of ML-based decision tools using routine clinical data in high-burden, resource-limited settings to guide risk stratification, optimize monitoring intensity, and inform public health strategies for HCV control and elimination in Pakistan and highlight the need for broader validation across larger, multicenter cohorts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.