ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Influenza vaccination uptake and associated factors among healthcare workers in Chengdu's maternal and child health institutions in the post-pandemic era.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Behavioral pathways linking influenza vaccine knowledge, uptake, vaccination intention, and recommendation behavior among healthcare workers: a cross-sectional study in Shijingshan District, Beijing.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Factors associated with the transformation of intention into action in influenza vaccination among healthcare professionals: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study assessed influenza vaccination uptake, knowledge, beliefs, and willingness among healthcare workers (HCWs) in maternal and child health (MCH) institutions in Chengdu in the post-COVID-19 era and identified factors associated with vaccination behavior. Methods: A cross-sectional online survey was conducted in 10 Chengdu MCH institutions from May 12 to June 30, 2025, using a validated questionnaire. Analyses included descriptive statistics, univariate tests (chi-square; independent-samples Results: Among 1,880 HCWs, 35.21% (662) reported receiving influenza vaccination since June 2024, and 10.43% reported clinician-diagnosed influenza. Before the 2025 influenza season, 57.61% reported willingness to be vaccinated. Objective knowledge was suboptimal: 45.05% correctly identified the time to develop protective antibodies (2-4 weeks), and 43.72% correctly identified the duration of protection (at least 6 months). Belief scores increased with higher education and professional title ( Conclusion: Influenza vaccination coverage among HCWs in Chengdu MCH institutions remained suboptimal in the post-pandemic period, with a clear intention-behavior gap. Uptake was associated with more favorable beliefs, higher willingness, older age, higher education, and institutional/departmental and occupational factors. Targeted strategies to strengthen confidence, improve access and convenience, and tailor interventions to specific departments and job categories are needed to increase coverage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.