ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Interventions for health equity with a One Health focus: a review of reviews.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The One Sustainable Health for All (OSH) Forum was launched in 2021 to promote a transdisciplinary "One Health/Planetary Health" approach in line with the 2030 Sustainable Development Goals. The "One Health" approach is a holistic and system-based approach that recognizes the interconnection between health of humans, animals and ecosystems. The OSH Forum leads thematic international working groups (IWGs), and the IWG on health equity undertook a scoping review as part of its mandate. This scoping review of reviews focused on actions to achieve health equity in the realm of One Health. The aim was to describe the types of health equity actions, to identify knowledge gaps and to recommend approaches integrating health equity and One Health. Methods: The literature search only included peer-reviewed action-focused papers. The WHO building blocks were adapted to categorize the lines of action into five key areas. Results: We analyzed 62 reviews out of 295 action-focused papers. Predominant actions were in the area of service delivery (26/62 reviews). Health equity was addressed through governance in 13 reviews, information/evidence data in 7, technologies in 11, and human resources in 5. Refugees, immigrants, and racial/ethnic minorities were the main targeted communities. The connection of health equity and One Health was not directly addressed except in two reviews. Nearly all the reviews were from high-income countries. Few studies assessed the impact of the interventions on health equity. Recurrent themes across the reviews were: the importance of addressing the social determinants of health; the need for disaggregated data; the critical role of human resources and community engagement; and the need to analyze power imbalances. Conclusion: The review highlighted a dire need for studies on the impact of interventions on health equity. Given the limited connections made between health equity and One Health, using a health equity lens to assess One Health initiatives, and vice versa, appears warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.