ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Interventions for environmentally sustainable and climate-resilient cities and communities for the aging population in South Korea: a scoping review.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: As the Republic of Korea undergoes demographic transitions, exposure to climate-related health risks is intensifying. In response, the government has considered population aging as part of their national plans of climate adaptation and health, and local governments have also worked on age-friendly city plans aligned with WHO guidelines. However, evidence of interventions contributing to environmental sustainability and climate resilience remains limited and unclear. Methods: Synthesizing Korean-language evidence, this review is the first to map how age-friendly interventions incorporate or miss climate resilience and environmental sustainability through a scoping review. Results: Using three Korean search engines (DBpia, KCI, RISS) on June 3, 2024, 35 interventions were retrieved from the final 31 publication records. The review found that interventions for age-friendly cities and communities (AFCC) largely neglect environmental sustainability and climate resilience, with government-driven initiatives relying on limited indicators. The most popular AFCC domains that the reviewed interventions belong to were Domain 1 (Outdoor spaces and buildings), followed by 8 (Community support and health services) and 7 (Communication and information). No interventions were observed under Domain 5 (Civic participation and employment). Discussion: Capturing limited comprehensiveness, predominance of government-driven interventions, and lack of robust evidence on their effectiveness, this review underscores the need to integrate climate change considerations into the under-addressed domains of the AFCC framework. At the policy level, the authors recommend promoting young older adults' community engagement, innovation through non-governmental sector, and development of indicators through implementation research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.