Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42051978›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the 2025 9th International Conference on Medical and Health Informatics. International Conference on Medical and Health Informatics (9th : 2025 : Kyoto, Japan)2025

Risk Prediction and Interpretation for Fall Events Using Explainable AI and Large Language Models.

Jake Luo, Masoud Khani, Jazzmyne Adams, Qiang Lu, Kristian O'Connor, David R Friedland

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the 2025 9th International Conference on Medical and Health Informatics. International Conference on Medical and Health Informatics (9th : 2025 : Kyoto, Japan), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jake LuoHealth Informatics Department, Zilber College of Pubic Health, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.
Masoud KhaniHealth Informatics & Computer Science Department, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, USA.
Jazzmyne AdamsDepartment of Otolaryngology and Communication Sciences, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, USA.
Qiang LuDepartment of Computer Science & Technology, China University of Petroleum, Beijing, China.
Kristian O'ConnorDepartment of Kinesiology, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, USA.
David R FriedlandKeck School of Medicine, University of South California, Los Angeles, USA.

Funding

Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR001436 · NCATS · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI FREED, JULIE K · 2015 to 2025
$47.5M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001436
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Falls represent a significant public health concern, particularly among older adults, with approximately 35.6 million cases annually in the United States alone. Traditional machine learning-based fall risk prediction methods often lack precision and interpretability, limiting their effectiveness in clinical settings. This study aims to develop and validate an explainable machine learning approach for fall risk prediction that combines predictive accuracy with interpretable results and leverages large language models for enhanced communication, enabling healthcare providers to make informed decisions about fall prevention strategies. We developed an integrated machine learning pipeline utilizing XGBoost classifier to process key health indicators such as age, and diagnosis history, with the model's interpretability enhanced through SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) values. Results were transformed into natural language narratives using LangChain and large language models, which automated the generation of personalized reports combining both risk assessments and feature explanations, with patients classified into low (0-40%), medium (40-70%), and high (70-100%) risk groups based on predicted probabilities. The XG-Boost classifier emerged as the best-performing model, achieving 71% accuracy, 69% precision, 76% recall, an F1-score of 72%, and an ROC AUC of 0.71 on the testing dataset. The SHAP analysis provided transparent insights into feature importance, highlighting critical contributors to fall risk prediction. The integration of large language models through LangChain successfully transformed complex model outputs into comprehensible narratives, generating detailed explanations that included both high-level risk summaries and specific feature contributions for healthcare providers and patients. Our integrated approach demonstrates the feasibility of combining high-accuracy fall risk prediction with explainable AI techniques and large language models, with the system's ability to provide interpretable results and generate clear, personalized risk communications representing a significant advancement in developing practical AI-driven tools for clinical fall risk assessment, potentially improving the implementation of preventive interventions in healthcare settings.

Indexed as

Clinical Decision Support SystemsExplainable Artificial IntelligenceFall Risk PredictionLarge Language ModelsMachine Learning in HealthcareSHAP Values

Identifiers

PMID42051978
PMCPMC13112544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.