Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42051920›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of public health2026

Spatiotemporal Characteristics of Health Collaboration Development in China's Urban Agglomerations: An Empirical Analysis of Four Major Regions.

Xiangfei Li, Wentao Zhu, Xumin Zhu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Xiangfei Li *School of Economics and Management, Tiangong University, Tianjin, China.
Wentao Zhu *School of Economics and Management, Tiangong University, Tianjin, China.
Xumin ZhuSchool of Public Administration and Policy, Renmin University of China, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study analyzed China's four most politically significant and economically dynamic urban agglomerations-Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei (BTH), Yangtze River Delta (YRD), Pearl River Delta (PRD), and Chengdu-Chongqing (CY)-to explore their health development trends from 2005 to 2023 and compare their spatiotemporal characteristics in coordinated health development. Methods: We employed an integrated index construction method and an improved urban gravity model to build urban health network models, investigating the coordinated relationships and features of health development in these agglomerations. Results: Over 17 years, the four agglomerations showed both commonalities and unique differences in health coordination. The degree of coordinated development strengthened significantly, although it was notably influenced by major policies and public health events. Core cities exhibited substantial radiating effects on regional health coordination. PRD and YRD exhibited more pronounced growth in coordination intensity than BTH and CY. Distinct coordination patterns emerged: BTH displayed a unipolar radiation structure, YRD a polycentric network, PRD a core-periphery structure, and CY a dual-core, policy-driven coordination structure. Conclusion: The findings reveal the critical role of core cities and policy interventions in shaping regional health collaboration networks, providing insights into how to achieve more balanced health resource allocation and equity in urban agglomerations.

Indexed as

Urban HealthChinaCitiesCooperative BehaviorHumansSpatio-Temporal Analysiscollaborative governancepublic healthregional integrationurban agglomerationsurban network structure

Identifiers

PMID42051920
PMCPMC13112371

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.