ArticleJournal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions2026
Contemporary Trends in Disparities for Renal Artery Stenting and Angioplasty in the United States.
Article in Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Renal artery stenting for atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis: A review of contemporary data.World journal of nephrology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Over the past 2 decades, several randomized clinical studies, including the STAR, ASTRAL, and CORAL trials, investigated interventions for atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis (RAS). However, a gap exists in the available data concerning racial disparities in the context of endovascular intervention for RAS. To address this gap, we conducted a comprehensive investigation utilizing a national database. Methods: The National Inpatient Sample was queried between 2005 to 2019, for adult patients with RAS. Endovascular interventions included angioplasty and/or stenting. The Cochran-Armitage test was conducted to assess trends in the proportion of endovascular intervention among races. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the patient profile of those who received endovascular intervention, nonroutine discharge, and in-hospital mortality. Admissions involving fibromuscular dysplasia and open intervention were excluded. Results: In total, 792,108 admissions involving RAS were identified; 634,801 were White patients, 80,585 were Black patients, 44,415 were Hispanic, 12,409 were Asian or Pacific Islander, 3879 were Native American, and 16,019 were of other race. The proportion of utilization of endovascular procedures was trending downward by an average of -2.0% per year ( Conclusions: Over the 15-year study period, there was a decreasing trend in the proportion of endovascular intervention for RAS for both White and non-White patients, though the decrease in trend was larger among White patients. Additionally, Black patients had lower odds of undergoing endovascular treatment, lower odds of routine discharge, and lower odds of mortality compared to White patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.