ArticleCureus2026
Patient Safety Culture and Its Work-Related Predictors Among Hemodialysis Nurses in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia: A Multicentre Cross-Sectional Study Using the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Patient safety culture is a critical determinant of healthcare quality, particularly in high-risk environments such as hemodialysis units, where complex procedures, advanced technology, and vulnerable patient populations increase the likelihood of adverse events. Despite global emphasis on patient safety, evidence regarding safety culture in hemodialysis settings within Saudi Arabia remains limited. This study aimed to assess patient safety culture and identify its work-related predictors among hemodialysis nurses in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, using the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture (HSOPSC). Methods A multicentre cross-sectional study was conducted among 400 nurses working in renal dialysis units across four hospitals in Jeddah. A convenience sampling technique was employed. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire comprising sociodemographic and work-related variables and the HSOPSC tool, which evaluates 12 dimensions of patient safety culture. Descriptive statistics were used to summarise participant characteristics and safety culture dimensions. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify predictors of overall patient safety culture, with statistical significance set at p < 0.05. Results The overall patient safety culture score was moderate (mean = 3.29 ± 0.74). The highest-rated dimensions were management support for patient safety (mean = 3.37) and organisational learning/continuous improvement (mean = 3.36), while frequency of events reported scored the lowest (mean = 3.20). Most respondents rated patient safety as "very good" (n = 150, 37.5%) or "excellent" (n = 79, 19.8%), although 38.3% (n = 153) reported no safety events in the preceding 12 months. Significant predictors of higher patient safety culture included having 3-5 years of work experience (odds ratio (OR) = 2.32, p = 0.003), working less than 50 hours per week (OR = 1.64, p = 0.016), and reporting fewer or moderate numbers of safety events. Conclusion Patient safety culture among hemodialysis nurses in Jeddah is moderately positive but reveals critical gaps in event reporting and workload-related factors. Work experience, working hours, and organisational context significantly influence safety perceptions. Targeted interventions focusing on strengthening reporting systems, optimising staffing, and reinforcing organisational support are essential to enhance patient safety culture in hemodialysis settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.