Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42051738›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in medicine2026

Problem-based learning in traditional Chinese medicine education: current applications and future directions.

Naihan Jiang, Shuyan Li

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Naihan JiangTraditional Chinese Medicine (Zhongjing) School, Henan University of Chinese Medicine, Zhengzhou, China.
Shuyan LiTraditional Chinese Medicine (Zhongjing) School, Henan University of Chinese Medicine, Zhengzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Problem-Based Learning (PBL), a student-centered and problem-oriented instructional approach, has increasingly been introduced into Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) education. This structured integrative review synthesizes existing empirical studies examining the application of PBL across foundational, clinical, and classical literature courses in TCM curricula. Available evidence suggests that PBL may be associated with improvements in student engagement, case-based reasoning, and collaborative learning within specific educational contexts. However, the current literature is largely composed of single-institution, quasi-experimental studies with heterogeneous outcome measures and limited long-term evaluation. In addition to summarizing reported benefits, this review identifies persistent challenges, including insufficient case standardization, variability in faculty facilitation, and misalignment between instructional design and assessment systems. Based on these findings, several directions for future research and curriculum development are outlined. Overall, while PBL represents a potentially valuable complementary instructional strategy in TCM education, further rigorous and standardized investigations are required to clarify its sustained educational impact.

Indexed as

curriculum implementationeducational reformlearning outcome evaluationproblem-based learningtraditional Chinese medicine education

Identifiers

PMID42051738
PMCPMC13111018

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.