ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Construction and validation of a machine learning-based prediction model for postoperative complications in patients with chronic otitis media.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: A machine learning prediction model was developed and validated using Clinical Multi-omics (CMO) indicators to assess the risk of postoperative complications in patients with Chronic Otitis Media (COM). This model is intended to aid in perioperative management and individualized intervention. Methods: Patients were randomly allocated into a training set ( Results: Multivariate analysis identified a history of diabetes, previous ear surgery, otorrhea, middle ear mucosal status, cholesteatoma presence, Eustachian tube function score, and preoperative C-reactive protein level as independent risk factors. Among the constructed models, the Random Forest model demonstrated superior overall performance, and the model was 0.885 in the training set and 0.853 in the validation set. The model also showed good calibration. DCA indicated significant clinical net benefit across a wide threshold probability range. SHAP analysis confirmed that a history of previous ear surgery and cholesteatoma presence were the most influential predictors. Conclusion: A machine learning-based prediction model for complications after COM surgery was developed and validated. The Random Forest model performed optimally, effectively predicting complication risk with favorable performance and considerable potential for clinical translation. It can serve as a promising tool for preoperative risk assessment and targeted postoperative monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.