ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
An integrated clinical and imaging model for predicting post-traumatic nonunion.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This model aims to support early risk stratification and clinical decision-making. Methods: A retrospective cohort of 343 patients with unilateral closed long bone fractures treated by internal fixation was analyzed. Clinico-radiological variables-including Injury Severity Index, maximum fracture gap width, volume of cystic changes, callus volume growth rate, and Radiographic Union Scale for Tibial fractures (RUST) score-were systematically collected. Predictors were selected using Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression. Multivariable logistic regression and multiple machine learning algorithms (e.g., random forest, gradient boosting machine) were applied. The dataset was split 7:3 into training and validation sets. All feature selection and model hyperparameter tuning were restricted to the training set, information leakage was avoided via 10-fold cross-validation, and a single evaluation was finally conducted on the independent validation set. Model performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), calibration curves, and decision curve analysis. Results: Training and validation cohorts exhibited comparable baseline characteristics. Five independent predictors were identified: Injury Severity Index, maximum fracture gap width, and cystic change volume were risk factors, whereas callus growth rate and RUST score were protective. The gradient boosting machine model achieved the highest predictive accuracy, with an AUC of 0.866 (95% Confidence Interval (CI): 0.783-0.948) in training and 0.858 (95% CI: 0.716-1.000) in validation. Calibration was satisfactory, and decision curve analysis demonstrated a superior net benefit across threshold probabilities. A nomogram was constructed, and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis improved interpretability. Conclusion: A machine learning model integrating clinical and imaging predictors was successfully developed and validated for predicting post-traumatic nonunion. It exhibits strong discriminative ability and may assist in personalized treatment planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.