Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42051686›Full record

ArticleUrban transformations2026

Using doughnut economics to structure whole-system thinking with multidisciplinary stakeholders - a soft systems approach.

Annika Hjelmskog, Jaime Toney, Marian Scott, John Crawford, Cris Hasan, Petra Meier

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Urban transformations, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Annika HjelmskogSocial and Public Health Sciences Unit, School of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Clarice Pears Building, 90 Byres Road, Glasgow, G12 8TB UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4982-9621
Jaime ToneySchool of Geographical and Earth Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G128QQ UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3182-6887
Marian ScottSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8QS UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3709-0623
John CrawfordAdam Smith Business School, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8QQ UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7139-0355
Cris HasanAdam Smith Business School, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8QQ UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7211-0688
Petra MeierSocial and Public Health Sciences Unit, School of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Clarice Pears Building, 90 Byres Road, Glasgow, G12 8TB UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5354-1933

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study considers an alternative framework for sustainable and equitable human prosperity in the city of Glasgow. The city's ambition to transform to a Green Wellbeing Economy is explored through cross-sector engagement with Doughnut Economics: a framework that considers social and ecological wellbeing simultaneously. Cities globally are home to an ever-increasing share of the world's population, and disproportionate contributors to ecological degradation, making them crucial partners for progress towards this goal. Significant buy-in is therefore required from a diverse range of cross-sector and multidisciplinary stakeholders. We ask how conceptualising interconnections between people and planet is aided by the Doughnut framework, and whether it supports systems thinking for stakeholders working in policy and practice. This paper examines the potential of applying the Doughnut Economics framework in Glasgow, Scotland, to (1) enhance understanding of the socio-ecological systems we live in, and (2) guide action-oriented solutions with multidisciplinary stakeholders. We used soft systems approaches - a qualitative method that can help define complex problems and direct action - to navigate complexity, align plural perspectives, and identify enabling conditions for whole-system change. Drawing on five participatory workshops and desk-based analysis, we co-produced a City Portrait of Glasgow spanning 44 dimensions derived from the Doughnut framework. We find that the Doughnut framework encourages cross-sector collaboration, supports holistic systems thinking, and that the Portrait tools can identify policy synergies and trade-offs in relation to the Doughnut's wellbeing goals. The framework therefore has the potential to promote policy coherence if these insights are subsequently translated and operationalised into meaningful city-wide action. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s42854-026-00093-1.

Indexed as

Climate changeDoughnut economicsEquityHealthSoft systemsSustainabilityWellbeingWellbeing economy

Identifiers

PMID42051686
PMCPMC13111525

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.