ReviewJournal of clinical and experimental dentistry2026
How uncommon is the occurrence of orthokeratinized odontogenic cyst in the maxilla? A systematic review and a new case report.
Review in Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Orthokeratinized Odontogenic Cyst: Insights From a Case Series With a Review of Literature.Case reports in dentistry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The orthokeratinized odontogenic cyst (OOC) is a benign intraosseous lesion, typically found in the posterior mandible in male patients in the third and fourth decades of life. Although there has been a growing number of documented cases in the last decade, the prevalence and unique characteristics of maxillary OOC remain poorly understood. Material and Methods: To assess how uncommon is OOC occurrence in the maxilla, a systematic review of the literature was conducted using the major electronic databases and rigorous criteria, including a new case report involving a young male patient. Results: A total of 36 OOC located specifically in the maxilla was analyzed. The results demonstrated that OOC in the maxilla is a rare finding. Interestingly, the majority of instances are associated with an impacted tooth, mainly unerupted third molars and canines, a pattern previously unexplored in the literature. An isolated occurrence of an OOC in the posterior maxilla without involvement of a third molar tooth, as observed in this present case, is relatively uncommon and has been reported in only five other cases. Careful enucleation and curettage with removal of the impacted teeth, when present, followed by histopathological analysis, has proven to be the most effective approach for accurate diagnosis and clinical success. Conclusions: This study reinforces that orthokeratinized odontogenic cysts should be included in the differential diagnosis of intraosseous lesions in the maxilla, especially when associated with unerupted third molars and canines, which may clinically resemble dentigerous cysts.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.