ReviewJournal of clinical and experimental dentistry2026
Clinical Confidence in Endodontics: A Cross-Sectional Study of Undergraduate Students' First Patient Experience.
Review in Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Endodontics is a complex and often stressful dental procedure for undergraduate students, requiring the development of fine motor skills and manual dexterity. Performing this treatment for the first time on patients can be particularly challenging. This cross-sectional observational study aims to evaluate the perceptions and self-reported confidence levels of fifth-year dental students when performing their first endodontic treatment on patients. Material and Methods: Following their first root canal treatment performed in the clinical setting under the supervision of an endodontics instructor, fifth-year students completed a structured questionnaire. The survey included Likert-scale items assessing perceived case difficulty and confidence across various stages of the procedure. Additionally, an open-ended question was included to gather qualitative feedback for potential improvements in endodontic education. Results: A total of 179 students completed the questionnaire, yielding a 89.5% response rate. Molars were reported as the most challenging teeth to treat, while premolars were the most frequently treated. Students identified root canal obturation as the most complex phase of the procedure and reported the lowest confidence during working length determination. Conclusions: Enhancing the number of preclinical workshops prior to patient-based endodontic treatments may improve students' confidence and help them develop the manual skills necessary for successful clinical performance.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.