Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42051645›Full record

ReviewMaternal-fetal medicine (Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)2026

Breech Presentation: Delivery Management and Future Perspectives.

Marta Fiorentini, Bianca Nedu, Fabrizio Dapoto, Silvia Brognoli, Elena Brunelli, Aly Youssef

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Maternal-fetal medicine (Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Marta FiorentiniObstetric Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna 40138, Italy.
Bianca NeduObstetric Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna 40138, Italy.
Fabrizio DapotoObstetric Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna 40138, Italy.
Silvia BrognoliObstetric Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna 40138, Italy.
Elena BrunelliObstetric Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna 40138, Italy.
Aly YoussefObstetric Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna 40138, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breech presentation is a relatively common fetal malposition, affecting 3% to 5% of fetuses at term. Although various clinical conditions are associated with breech presentation, its prevalence decreases as gestational age progresses toward term. Despite ongoing global academic and clinical debates on the management of breech presentation, there is a growing recognition that the decision on the mode of delivery should consider the patient's preferences. Adequate counseling on available options is crucial. For patients with a term singleton fetus in a breech position who prefer a planned vaginal delivery, the external cephalic version (ECV) serves as an alternative to planned cesarean section (CS). ECV involves gently manipulating the fetus on the mother's abdomen to achieve a cephalic presentation, with a reported success rate of 58%. The procedure is typically performed at or after 37 weeks, and a thorough assessment of fetal well-being is mandatory. While short-term benefits of planned CS for term breech presentation have been demonstrated in neonatal and maternal outcomes, a trial of breech vaginal delivery can be considered in the absence of contraindications and based on the patient's preference. It is crucial for an experienced healthcare provider to offer appropriate assistance to ensure maternal and child well-being and minimize complications, whether attempting a vaginal birth or opting for a CS for breech presentation. Ultrasonography plays a crucial role in diagnosing breech presentation, and transabdominal ultrasound can offer valuable information for predicting ECV success, including placental location and amniotic fluid quantity. Emerging techniques in ultrasonography, such as transperineal ultrasound to assess fetal presenting part engagement and transabdominal ultrasound to evaluate fetal head flexion and position, are increasingly employed in labor ward evaluations. The recently introduced breech progression angle, a transperineal sonographic parameter, holds promise as a reliable tool not only for predicting ECV success but also for assessing the risk of cesarean delivery in patients who will undergo a trial of breech vaginal delivery.

Indexed as

Breech cesarean deliveryBreech presentationBreech progression angleBreech vaginal deliveryExternal cephalic versionTransperineal ultrasound

Identifiers

PMID42051645
PMCPMC13120577

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.