Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42051626›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in behavioral neuroscience2026

The role of AI and team topologies in enhancing decision-making flexibility by reducing cognitive overload.

Hugo Matos-Sousa, Nuno Sousa

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hugo Matos-SousaCoverflex (Universal Cover, S.A.), Braga, Portugal.
Nuno SousaCentro Universitário de Jaguaríuna (UniFAJ), Jaguaríuna, SP, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Decision-making is a critical skill that impacts the performance of teams, particularly in high-stakes and complex environments, and is known to be affected by cognitive load. When teams face an overload of information and multiple decisions are needed, the process of decision-making becomes slower, performance becomes reduced, and, eventually, there is a burden and exhaustion of the team. This article provides an informed behavioral neuroscience perspective on how psychobiological constraints on behavior, particularly cognitive load, working memory limits, and decision-making under pressure, become relevant in socially organized team settings, and on how the combination of artificial intelligence (AI) with team topologies (TT) may reduce cognitive load and produce an applied framework for understanding the optimization of team architecture and performance by leveraging AI as a tool to reduce cognitive load. By combining a psychobiological perspective with an organizational and translational perspective, the future of the intersection of AI with TT may be generalized and impact teams well-being and performance.

Indexed as

artificial intelligence (AI)behaviorcognitive loaddecision-makingteam topologies (TT)

Identifiers

PMID42051626
PMCPMC13111189

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.