ReviewFrontiers in rehabilitation sciences2026
Nanomaterial-enabled physical rehabilitation: mechanisms, evidence, and translational pathways.
Review in Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Editorial: Nanomaterial design and engineering for enhanced physical therapy modalities.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Physical rehabilitation relies on macroscopic therapeutic modalities such as ultrasound, photothermal stimulation, electrical activation, magnetic fields, and controlled mechanical loading to restore function after injury, surgery, or neurological impairment. Although these approaches are clinically established and widely used, their effects remain constrained by limited spatial precision, shallow penetration, heterogeneous tissue responses, and insufficient control over the cellular and molecular mechanisms that govern healing. Advances in nanoscience have introduced a new class of materials capable of mediating, amplifying, or refining external physical stimuli at the nanoscale. Nanomaterials exhibit tunable optical, magnetic, mechanical, and electrical properties that enable the conversion of externally applied energy into localized thermal, mechanical, or electrochemical cues, thereby influencing cellular behavior with a degree of precision not achievable by conventional modalities alone. These properties suggest potential-demonstrated primarily in preclinical models-to improve musculoskeletal repair, modulate nociceptive pathways, enhance neuromuscular activation, and integrate with regenerative scaffolds, though clinical validation remains limited. Yet, despite promising experimental findings, translation into rehabilitation practice remains limited by gaps in mechanistic understanding, variability in experimental design, safety uncertainties, and complex regulatory pathways. This review examines the fundamental properties of nanomaterials relevant to physical rehabilitation, analyzes their interactions with primary therapeutic modalities, evaluates preclinical and early clinical evidence, and outlines translational, safety, and regulatory considerations. By synthesizing mechanistic insight with empirical data, the review defines realistic opportunities and the limitations that must be resolved to advance nanomaterial-enabled physical rehabilitation toward clinical implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.