ArticleFrontiers in immunology2026
Complement-mediated ADCP as a distinct and finite cytotoxic mechanism of monoclonal antibodies.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: Macrophage phagocytosis is a major cytotoxic mechanism for therapeutic monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) that opsonize target cells. This antibody-dependent cellular phagocytosis (ADCP) can occur via the Fcγ or complement pathways, but the relative contribution of these pathways to mAb-mediated cell clearance is not known. Here, we analyzed the kinetics, functional cooperation, and phagocytic capacities of Fcγ receptor-dependent and complement-dependent ADCP, separately and concomitantly, in primary macrophages challenged with mAb-opsonized lymphocytes. Methods: Using quantitative live-cell imaging of primary mouse macrophages, genetic disruption of Fcγ receptor signaling, and controlled modulation of complement activity, we directly compared the kinetics, capacity, and exhaustion behavior of ADCP via the Fcγ (fADCP) and complement (cADCP) pathways. Results: cADCP operates as a mechanistically independent phagocytic pathway with distinct temporal dynamics. Relative to fADCP, cADCP exhibits delayed onset but substantially greater cumulative target clearance. When both pathways are engaged simultaneously, their effects on target removal are additive, indicating functional non-redundancy. Notably, macrophages rendered refractory to further phagocytosis following fADCP retain full capacity for cADCP, demonstrating that complement receptor-mediated engulfment can bypass Fcγ receptor-associated hypophagia. However, despite its greater capacity, cADCP is also finite, as increasing target burden induces a dose-dependent state of complement-associated phagocytic exhaustion that is kinetically distinct from fADCP hypophagia and is largely reversible within 24 h. Discussion: Our mechanistic understanding of mAb-mediated cytotoxicity via ADCP is disproportionately focused on Fcγ receptor engagement and signaling, with comparatively less emphasis on the role of complement activation. These findings establish complement-mediated ADCP as a quantitatively powerful macrophage effector pathway that can be leveraged to enhance the overall cytotoxic efficacy of mAbs. Further, our work provides a functional framework for understanding how Fcγ receptor and complement pathways differentially contribute to macrophage cytotoxic capacity and highlights effector exhaustion as a shared but mechanistically distinct constraint on sustained antibody-mediated cell clearance. Effector exhaustion therefore represents a fundamental bottleneck to durable responses to ADCP-inducing therapeutic antibodies, but one that can potentially be mitigated via utilization of both ADCP pathways.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.